8 replies

1. Andy Bond Mastodon 2 min later

   @11ty I continue to do the bare minimum on my website and keep being rewarded for it 😅

   Pretty cool though <3

   1. Build Awesome Mastodon 6 min later

      @andybond the algorithm is biased against minimalism, for the record!

2. Richard MacManus Mastodon 7 min later

   @11ty #313 with a bullet! But seriously, I'm happy with 100s all round *except* for that 98 for performance. And I have looked at trying to get 100 there, but it's difficult for an image-heavy site like mine. I will keep looking for ways though...one day I'll break the top 100 😂

   1. Build Awesome Zach Leatherman Mastodon 12 min later

      @ricmac @11ty looks like adjusting your image sizes in Eleventy Image, inlining your CSS, and maybe a fetchpriority=high paired with loading=eager to improve your LCP are the big ticket items reported there!

      But the site is fast as-is so I wouldn’t sweat it too much 😅

      1. Richard MacManus Mastodon 16 min later

         @zachleat @11ty Thanks, great suggestions. I have found with experimentation that one can go too low with reducing image sizes, so I found a happy medium there. Overall though, I’m satisfied with my scores here. Thanks for doing this service, it’s a regular reminder to keep an eye on web performance.

3. Nicolas Hoizey Mastodon 1 hr later

   @11ty I guess I'll have to wait for the next run, I still had accessibility issues on my latest site… 😅

   So thanks for helping me improve accessibility! 🙏😍

   1. Build Awesome Mastodon 1 hr later

      @nhoizey hoping to run a little more often moving forward! I simplified some of the workflow

      1. Nicolas Hoizey Mastodon 1 hr later

         @11ty great! 😍